<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Gahtan's Technology and Internet Law Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog</link>
	<description>Law, Technology, VOIP, Wireless, Security and the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>porn domain fetches 9.5 million</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
	<category>Electronic Commerce</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	According to Computer World, a recent sale of the porn.com domain fetched a cash price of US$9.5 million, the second highest price for a domain name sale.  Sex.com was reportedly sold for $12 million in 2005 but was not an all-cash transaction.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybersquatting Non-Famous Names</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	It used to be that cybersquatters would register the name of a famous person, company or product and then try and sell the name to the rightful owner.  But now things have changed.  According to Wired News:
	These days, cybersquatters seek to register a star&#8217;s domain before that person becomes famous, and then develop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex for US$12 million</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	According to Reuters, SEX.COM has been sold for about US$12 million in cash and stocks.  This tops the US$7.5 million paid for BUSINESS.COM during the dot.com frenzy.  The site currently makes money selling banner advertising but the buyers are expected to add other revenue generating services to the site.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT.Can reports on recent Canadian Domain Name case</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/18/itcan-reports-on-recent-canadian-domain-name-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/18/itcan-reports-on-recent-canadian-domain-name-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/18/itcan-reports-on-recent-canadian-domain-name-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IT.Can's new blog site reports on the recent CIRA decision in Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company v. Ebenezer Thevasagayam.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/18/itcan-reports-on-recent-canadian-domain-name-case/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HomeDepotSucks</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/11/homedepotsucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/11/homedepotsucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/11/homedepotsucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Well, not really.  Actually, I like shopping at Home Depot.
	However, someone who thinks differently recently prevailed in a UDRP brought by Home Depot.  The Respondent was represented by the University of San Francisco Internet and Intellectual Property Justice Clinic.

Click here for a copy of the decision.
	Homer TLC, Inc. is the owner of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/11/11/homedepotsucks/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAQ on how to acquire an expiring domain name</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/10/26/faq-on-how-to-acquire-an-expiring-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/10/26/faq-on-how-to-acquire-an-expiring-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/10/26/faq-on-how-to-acquire-an-expiring-domain-name/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	So there&#8217;s a domain name you&#8217;ve always wanted.  It looks like it might expire soon.  What should you do?
Mike Davidson has the scope in How to Snatch an Expiring Domain.  This great article, although now a little dated, describes the entire process.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/10/26/faq-on-how-to-acquire-an-expiring-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
