<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Gahtan's Technology and Internet Law Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog</link>
	<description>Law, Technology, VOIP, Wireless, Security and the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>porn domain fetches 9.5 million</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
	<category>Electronic Commerce</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	According to Computer World, a recent sale of the porn.com domain fetched a cash price of US$9.5 million, the second highest price for a domain name sale.  Sex.com was reportedly sold for $12 million in 2005 but was not an all-cash transaction.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2007/05/16/porn-domain-fetches-95-million/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybersquatting Non-Famous Names</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	It used to be that cybersquatters would register the name of a famous person, company or product and then try and sell the name to the rightful owner.  But now things have changed.  According to Wired News:
	These days, cybersquatters seek to register a star&#8217;s domain before that person becomes famous, and then develop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/27/cybersquatting-non-famous-names/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Cache is Fair Use</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/27/google-cache-is-fair-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/27/google-cache-is-fair-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Intellectual Property</category>
	<category>Internet</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/27/google-cache-is-fair-use/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	From EFF&#8230;
	A district court in Nevada has ruled (pdf) that the Google cache is fair use.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/27/google-cache-is-fair-use/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex for US$12 million</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Domain Names</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	According to Reuters, SEX.COM has been sold for about US$12 million in cash and stocks.  This tops the US$7.5 million paid for BUSINESS.COM during the dot.com frenzy.  The site currently makes money selling banner advertising but the buyers are expected to add other revenue generating services to the site.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/25/sex-for-us12-million/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Election Restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/23/canadian-election-restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/23/canadian-election-restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Internet</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/23/canadian-election-restrictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Its election day in Canada.  Thought I&#8217;d crack open the Election Act and review some of the relevant provisions contained in Division 9, which deals with communications.  Specifically, Canada does not permit the transmission of election results, in a particular electoral district, prior to the close of all polling stations in that district. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/23/canadian-election-restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers and Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/lawyers-and-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/lawyers-and-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Internet</category>
	<category>Legal Profession</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/lawyers-and-blogging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	An edited version of the following appeared in my Bits and Bytes column in the December 12, 2005 issue of Law Times News:
	A blog or weblog is an online journal or newsletter that is kept on the Internet and updated frequently (usually daily).  Blogs may contain original articles on a particular topic or may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/lawyers-and-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SETI@home shutting down</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/17/setihome-shutting-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/17/setihome-shutting-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Internet</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/17/setihome-shutting-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence at Home (SETI@Home) project, which utilized a downloadable screen saver to harness idle CPU cycles from millions of Internet-connected PCs across the globe in order to analyze data collected from massive radio telescopes in the search for patterns that might signal intelligent life, shut down last week.  However, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/17/setihome-shutting-down/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexa opens up via Web Services</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/13/197/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/13/197/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Internet</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/13/197/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	John Battelle reports that Alexa is opening up its web search platform:
	Anyone can also use Alexa&#8217;s servers and processing power to mine its index to discover things - perhaps, to outsource the crawl needed to create a vertical search engine, for example. Or maybe to build new kinds of search engines entirely, or &#8230;well, whatever [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/13/197/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
