<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Gahtan's Technology and Internet Law Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog</link>
	<description>Law, Technology, VOIP, Wireless, Security and the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Australia forces anti-spam on ISPs</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/28/australia-forces-anti-spam-on-isps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/28/australia-forces-anti-spam-on-isps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/28/australia-forces-anti-spam-on-isps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Australia has become the first jurisdiction to force ISPs operating in that country to provide anti-spam options to users.  The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), through its Internet Industry Spam Code Of Practice, also requires ISPs to inform end-users on ways to combat spam and to have a process for handling complaints from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/28/australia-forces-anti-spam-on-isps/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRTC seesk comments on National Do Not Call List and Telemarketing Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/26/crtc-seesk-comments-on-national-do-not-call-list-and-telemarketing-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/26/crtc-seesk-comments-on-national-do-not-call-list-and-telemarketing-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Privacy</category>
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/26/crtc-seesk-comments-on-national-do-not-call-list-and-telemarketing-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has released a public notice asking for input on the development and operation of a National Do Not Call List (DNCL) and on telemarketing rules.  The CRTC has been authorized to establish a national DNCL, select a third-party administrator for the national DNCL, and to levy administrative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/26/crtc-seesk-comments-on-national-do-not-call-list-and-telemarketing-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising on Windows startup screen</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/13/advertising-on-windows-startup-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/13/advertising-on-windows-startup-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/13/advertising-on-windows-startup-screen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Unless regulators block it, Microsoft may be set to do an end run around Google and Yahoo!  Why settle for a small adsense ad when you can take advantage of the whole screen while the user has nothing to do but wait for Windows to start up.
	from Softpedia

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/13/advertising-on-windows-startup-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charging for Email - would it be so bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/07/charging-for-email-would-it-be-so-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/07/charging-for-email-would-it-be-so-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 13:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/07/charging-for-email-would-it-be-so-bad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	There&#8217;s news that AOL and Yahoo are planning on implementing a certified email system based on Goodmail System&#8217;s CertifiedEmail technology.  Bulk email senders, who must represent that they have the recipient&#8217;s consent, can pay a small fee to get priority treatment by spam filters.  Personally, I think this could be a good thing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/07/charging-for-email-would-it-be-so-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borderline Spamming by ZDnet</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/23/borderline-spamming-by-zdnet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/23/borderline-spamming-by-zdnet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Privacy</category>
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/23/borderline-spamming-by-zdnet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Yesterday, I saw an article on ZDnet that I thought I&#8217;d comment on.  So I clicked the feedback button.  Turned out that in order to add any feedback, one had to register for ZDnet.  This did not just involved the usual request for an email address, which is then verified, but also [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/23/borderline-spamming-by-zdnet/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC announces legal action against spammers</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/22/ftc-announces-legal-action-against-spammers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/22/ftc-announces-legal-action-against-spammers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/22/ftc-announces-legal-action-against-spammers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	From eWeek - FTC Celebrates CAN-SPAM with Spam Suits:
	On Tuesday, the FTC said it filed complaints against three spam operations accused of violating CAN-SPAM, and said Canada&#8217;s, Competition Bureau and Attorneys General in Florida, North Carolina and Texas took action against or settled cases against five others.
	Those actions, coupled with better antispam technology have reduced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/22/ftc-announces-legal-action-against-spammers/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technorati and Spam Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/technorati-and-spam-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/technorati-and-spam-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/technorati-and-spam-blogs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I sometimes like to look for interesting stories on topics of interest using Technorati.  However, the rising number of spam blogs is making the task more time consuming.  Here&#8217;s a suggestion to Technorati - how about adding a &#8220;block this blog&#8221; button which can be used to prevent specified blogs from coming up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/21/technorati-and-spam-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC to report on CAN-SPAM</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/18/ftc-to-report-on-can-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/18/ftc-to-report-on-can-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Spam</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/18/ftc-to-report-on-can-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The FTC is set release a report, entitled Effectiveness and Enforcement of the CAN-SPAM Act, which addresses the the effectiveness of the 2 year old CAN-SPAM Act.  Officials from state and federal enforcement agencies, as well as the Canadian Competition Bureau, will also announce criminal law enforcement initiatives targeting illegal spam operations.
	CAN-SPAM, which stands [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2005/12/18/ftc-to-report-on-can-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
