<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Gahtan's Technology and Internet Law Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog</link>
	<description>Law, Technology, VOIP, Wireless, Security and the Internet</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Shaw fires back at Vonage over VOIP tax</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/09/shaw-fires-back-at-vonage-over-voip-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/09/shaw-fires-back-at-vonage-over-voip-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Voice over IP</category>
	<category>Network Neutrality</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/09/shaw-fires-back-at-vonage-over-voip-tax/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We obviously need to keep considering this issue from a competition perspective, but should also focus as much analysis on the consumer protection aspects.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/09/shaw-fires-back-at-vonage-over-voip-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>VOIP surcharged by Canadian ISP</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/08/voip-surcharged-by-canadian-isp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/08/voip-surcharged-by-canadian-isp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 11:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Voice over IP</category>
	<category>Network Neutrality</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/08/voip-surcharged-by-canadian-isp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	According to a Vonage Canada press release, it has submitted a request to the Canadian Radio-Television &#038; Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to investigate Shaw Communications (an ISP that serves western Canada) for recommending to its high-speed Internet customers that they pay an additional $10 charge if they use a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone service [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/03/08/voip-surcharged-by-canadian-isp/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>VOIP and Streaming Banned in Telus&#8217; Acceptable Use Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/27/voip-and-streaming-banned-in-telus-acceptable-use-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/27/voip-and-streaming-banned-in-telus-acceptable-use-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Voice over IP</category>
	<category>Network Neutrality</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/27/voip-and-streaming-banned-in-telus-acceptable-use-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	High speed wireless data sounds great, doesn&#8217;t it.  For approximately C$100 per month, you can get unlimited high speed data service from Telus or Bell.  But is it really unlimited?

The Section 5 of the Telus Terms and Conditions state, in part:  You will not use the service for: multi-media streaming; voice over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/02/27/voip-and-streaming-banned-in-telus-acceptable-use-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responding to the Network Neutrality Threat</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/11/responding-to-the-network-neutrality-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/11/responding-to-the-network-neutrality-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Network Neutrality</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/11/responding-to-the-network-neutrality-threat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Google, Yahoo, Vonage and other Internet content/service providers should develop a proactive response to the network neutrality threat.  My suggestion is that each should start offering a bandwidth testing service.  Add a little button on the home page for your customers to click and measure their network bandwidth and latency to your own [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/11/responding-to-the-network-neutrality-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/09/network-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/09/network-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>agahtan</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Voice over IP</category>
	<category>Network Neutrality</category>
		<guid>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/09/network-neutrality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Daily Wireless has a good article on network neutrality, including a number of good links.  While this can potentially turn into a serious problem, hopefully new competition for the telephone company / cable Internet broadband access duopoly - from (i) WiMax, (ii) EDGE/EVDO wireless data, and (iii) power line delivered Internet access - will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.gahtan.com/techlawblog/2006/01/09/network-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
